TNT93535 (Thursday 4th of December 2008 12:56:49 PM)

NObama: "won" hiselection to become senator by having sealed court records on his opponent illegally opened to embarrass said opponent into withdrawing. Palin: GOVERNOR with the highest approval rating out of any politician in the country who has a proven track record of going after corruption even if it's in her own party. NObama: only editor of the Harvard Law Review in history who wrote nothing for the law review, all records sealed. Palin: her life's an open book Palin clearly wins!

SpeakaDaEnglish (Thursday 4th of December 2008 08:56:30 AM)

Wrong again, he was addressing another poster who was honing in the homosexual lifestyle. Pay attention next time.

amyforlife (Thursday 4th of December 2008 05:29:53 AM)

Obama: a SENATOR for one of the most populous states in the Nation. Palin: Hockey mom (something my uneducated redneck neighbor is), mayor of a shit ass city in alaska. Obama: Harvard Grad, President of Harvard Law Review Palin: Beauty Contest Winner, 6 lame universities, journalist major yet can't name a single paper.. The clear winner is def Palin ***HINT i'm being SARCASTIC

amyforlife (Thursday 4th of December 2008 05:28:36 AM)

yea and a SENATOR for one of the most populous states in the Nation. Palin: Hockey mom (something my redneck neighbor is), mayor of a shit ass city in alaska. Obama: Harvard Grad, President of Law Review Palin: Beauty Contest Winner, 6 lame universities, journalist major yet can't name a single paper.. The clear winner is def Palin ***HINT i'm being SARCASTIC

USAthanks (Thursday 4th of December 2008 01:18:59 AM)

When a baby is delivered from a rectum, you can come back here egomez and say "I told you so". Where babies come from is not a religious fact, its an obvious conclusion based on historical & medical evidence. LOL!!

egomez90 (Wednesday 3rd of December 2008 11:58:02 PM)

Those are the "facts" if you are religious...not everyone is so they're not really facts at all.I guess I'll leave you alone since there's no point in debating with someone who's views are narrowed by ONLY religious "facts" and the idea that you should only present your argument in a biased manner and not take anything that would go against your point into consideration.

USAthanks (Wednesday 3rd of December 2008 11:53:15 PM)

Egomez says >> "I think what you mean to say is that you won't find STDs among hetero AND HOMO couples that keep their zippers up around strangers." The problem with your thinking ego is that it doesn't pencil out. The average number of partners for a hetero male in a life time is 10! The average number of partners that a gay male has in a life time is 1000!! To make matters worse, the average life span of the homosexual is 46 years! I don't like to see people die ego, and I'm the bad guy here??

USAthanks (Wednesday 3rd of December 2008 11:43:38 PM)

Egomez SAID >> "EXACTLY he didn't say that when he should have" I didn't realize the fairness doctrine was enacted already. :(

USAthanks (Wednesday 3rd of December 2008 11:41:06 PM)

My point egomez is that sex outside the boundaries that God set fourth is lethal. You came into this conversation half way and you obviously haven't taken SpeakDaEnglishes advise and go back to see where this conversation originated. I am not bias, just proving an important fact. Man kind was carefully and wonderfully made to reproduce. Sorry to confuse you with the facts.

egomez90 (Wednesday 3rd of December 2008 10:32:50 PM)

"He did not say sodomy is the ONLY way to spread disease." EXACTLY he didn't say that when he should have, he was looking only at sodomy and not hetero sex, and saying bad things that derive from sodomy ONLY and completely ignoring that the same bad things come from hetero sex. Do you not see the bias in that? If you don't you're pretty stupid and illogical.